Can AI Plan My Working Week?
A diary tells you when things happen. Could AI tell you when they should happen?
For many small businesses, the scarcest resource is not equipment, premises or even money.
It is time.
That becomes particularly obvious when one business contains several very different activities.
In my own case, a working week might include:
GCSE and A-level tuition;
preparing lessons and practical experiments;
filming;
photography;
video editing;
producing graphics and social-media material;
making personalised products;
answering enquiries;
preparing invoices and other administration;
maintaining equipment;
developing websites and other online material;
sailing and sailing-club work;
writing articles such as this one.
Individually, none of these necessarily presents a scheduling problem.
Put them all into the same week and something interesting happens.
The diary may say that there are enough hours.
Reality may disagree.
So I decided to consider a rather different use for artificial intelligence.
Could AI actually plan my working week?
Not merely put appointments into a calendar, but decide when different types of work ought to happen.
That turns out to be a much more interesting problem.
A Calendar Is Not Really a Plan
Suppose my diary contains a tuition lesson at 4.00 pm and another at 6.00 pm.
The calendar knows about two appointments.
But what does the working day really contain?
The first lesson may require preparation.
Perhaps I want to set up a practical experiment beforehand.
Afterwards, I may need to make notes about the student's progress.
The second lesson might require completely different equipment or teaching material.
Meanwhile, there may be an email enquiry waiting for a reply, a video that needs editing and an article that needs publishing.
The calendar records the fixed events.
It doesn't necessarily understand all the work surrounding them.
That is the first important distinction:
An appointment is not the same thing as a workload.
Give AI a Deliberately Difficult Week
A useful experiment would be to give an AI system a fictional but realistic collection of jobs.
For example:
Monday
9.00–11.00 — edit a promotional video
11.30 — answer customer enquiries
1.00 — prepare an A-level Physics practical
4.00–5.00 — GCSE Maths tuition
5.30–6.30 — A-level Physics tuition
7.00–8.00 — GCSE Science tuition
Tuesday
Morning — filming
Afternoon — editing and administration
Evening — tuition
Wednesday
Photography job during the morning
Product-production work during the afternoon
Tuition from late afternoon onwards
Thursday
Write and publish blog material
Prepare practical work
Film demonstrations
Evening tuition
Friday
Complete outstanding editing
Accounts and invoices
Equipment preparation
Tuition
Then add the activities that don't fit conveniently into neat boxes:
"Allow time for sailing."
"Write several social-media posts."
"Back up this week's video footage."
"Prepare next week's lessons."
"Deal with new customer enquiries quickly."
"Allow some time for jobs that overrun."
Suddenly this is no longer a simple diary exercise.
It is a scheduling problem.
The First AI Timetable Might Be Terrible
This is where the experiment becomes interesting.
If I simply tell AI:
"Fit all of these jobs into my week."
I might receive a beautifully organised timetable.
It might also be completely impossible.
For example:
8.00–9.00 Write blog
9.00–10.30 Film experiment
10.30–11.30 Edit video
11.30–12.00 Administration
12.00–1.00 Photography
1.00–2.00 Prepare lessons
2.00–3.00 Product production
3.00–4.00 Answer emails
4.00–9.00 Tuition
It looks wonderfully efficient.
There is only one problem.
Nobody actually works like that.
Where is lunch?
Where is the time required to change the studio setup?
What happens when filming takes twenty minutes longer than expected?
When is the camera footage transferred?
When are batteries charged?
What happens if a parent telephones?
What if an experiment takes longer to prepare than expected?
And after five hours of tuition in the evening, am I really going to start another complicated piece of work?
A timetable can be mathematically possible while being humanly ridiculous.
AI Needs Constraints
The solution is not necessarily to abandon AI.
It is to give it better information.
Instead of saying:
"Plan my week."
I could say:
"Plan my week subject to the following constraints."
For example:
tuition appointments are fixed;
allow at least 15 minutes between online lessons;
allow longer gaps where equipment must be changed;
do not schedule demanding creative work after a long evening of teaching;
include lunch;
include preparation time before practical lessons;
allow time after lessons for recording notes;
keep some unscheduled time each day;
group similar activities where possible;
allow travel time for work away from home;
treat customer enquiries as relatively high priority;
don't assume every job will finish exactly on time.
Now the AI has something much closer to the real problem.
And this is an important lesson about using AI generally:
The quality of an AI plan depends enormously upon the constraints we give it.
Preparation Time Is Real Work
This is particularly important in education.
A one-hour lesson does not necessarily represent one hour of work.
Suppose I want to demonstrate Young's modulus experimentally during an A-level Physics lesson.
Before the student arrives, I may need to:
select the wire;
set up the apparatus;
check the measurement equipment;
make sure the experiment works;
prepare questions;
locate the appropriate notes;
perhaps set up cameras or a visualiser;
prepare extension material.
The diary says:
Physics lesson — 1 hour.
The real workload might be considerably longer.
The same applies to filming.
A 20-minute finished video is certainly not a 20-minute job.
There may be:
planning -> setup -> filming -> retakes -> transferring files -> editing -> graphics -> sound -> rendering -> uploading -> promotion.
One advantage of using AI for planning is that it can be instructed to recognise these hidden tasks.
Travel Time Is More Than Driving Time
Suppose I have a photography or filming job away from my normal workplace.
AI needs to know that a 10.00 am appointment ten miles away doesn't mean I can work normally until 9.59.
There may be equipment to load.
Then there is travel.
Parking.
Unloading.
Setting up.
And afterwards everything happens in reverse.
A two-hour filming appointment could occupy half a working day.
That is the difference between event duration and event footprint.
A good planning system needs to understand both.
What About Sailing?
This produces another interesting scheduling problem.
Some activities are flexible but dependent upon external conditions.
Sailing is a good example.
A conventional diary might say:
Wednesday afternoon — sailing.
But Wednesday might be wet with virtually no wind, while Thursday afternoon could be ideal.
So perhaps AI shouldn't always allocate the activity immediately.
It might instead reserve a flexible block and reconsider it as better information becomes available.
The same principle could apply to outdoor photography, drone work where permitted, exterior filming or jobs requiring good natural light.
This moves us from a static timetable towards a dynamic plan.
Priorities Matter More Than Filling Empty Spaces
One of the biggest mistakes in time management is assuming that every empty space needs filling.
Imagine three jobs:
A: Reply to a potential new tuition customer.
B: Reorganise some archived photographs.
C: Finish tomorrow's lesson preparation.
All three are legitimate work.
They are not equally urgent.
An AI planner therefore needs more than duration.
It needs some concept of:
urgency + importance + deadline + consequences of delay.
The customer enquiry may deserve an immediate response.
Tomorrow's lesson preparation has a definite deadline.
The photograph archive might wait until there is genuinely spare time.
This is where AI potentially becomes much more useful than an ordinary calendar.
Batch Similar Jobs Together
There is another optimisation that humans sometimes overlook.
Changing tasks has a cost.
If the video studio is already set up, it might make sense to record three short videos rather than record one, dismantle everything and rebuild the studio tomorrow.
Similarly, if I am producing personalised products, several jobs using the same equipment might sensibly be grouped together.
The same applies to:
photography;
invoicing;
emails;
lesson preparation;
blog writing;
video editing;
social-media scheduling.
AI could identify these clusters.
Instead of asking:
"Where is there an empty hour?"
it could ask:
"What other work fits naturally with what is already happening?"
That is potentially much more valuable.
The Problem of Overruns
Real work doesn't obey the calendar.
A lesson might lead to an important question that deserves another few minutes.
A filming sequence might require another take.
A computer might decide to install something at precisely the wrong moment.
An experiment might refuse to behave.
An urgent enquiry might arrive.
If every minute has already been allocated, one delay causes a cascade through the rest of the day.
A better AI-generated timetable would deliberately contain buffer time.
Perhaps a 60-minute job receives a 75-minute block.
Perhaps there is a spare 30-minute recovery period during the afternoon.
Perhaps Friday afternoon contains a larger block for unfinished work.
At first sight, this looks inefficient.
In reality, it may make the entire week more efficient because the timetable becomes resilient.
AI Should Understand Energy as Well as Time
There is another factor that calendars rarely record.
Not every hour is equivalent.
For many people, there are times when concentration is particularly good.
Those periods are valuable.
They should perhaps be used for work such as:
complex writing;
planning;
difficult editing;
problem solving;
financial decisions;
technical development.
Other tasks require less uninterrupted concentration.
Those might include:
routine administration;
file organisation;
preparing equipment;
uploading completed material;
straightforward production work.
So instead of treating the week as forty identical one-hour boxes, an AI planner could consider the type of attention each job requires.
That begins to look much more like real management.
Could AI Replan the Week?
This is perhaps the most exciting possibility.
Monday doesn't go according to plan.
A filming job overruns by 45 minutes.
One editing job isn't completed.
A new customer enquiry arrives.
An appointment is cancelled on Wednesday.
The traditional diary simply records these events.
AI could potentially ask:
What should change now?
The unfinished editing could move into Wednesday's cancelled appointment.
A low-priority administration job could move to Friday.
The new enquiry could be dealt with immediately.
Nothing important needs to disappear.
The plan simply changes.
That is potentially one of AI's greatest advantages.
It can keep replanning.
But Should AI Be Allowed to Control the Diary?
There is an important distinction between:
AI suggesting
and
AI deciding.
I would be very happy for AI to say:
"You have scheduled too much work on Thursday."
Or:
"If you move the editing to Tuesday morning, you can film three items consecutively on Thursday."
Or:
"You haven't allowed preparation time for Friday's practical lesson."
That is useful assistance.
I would be considerably less comfortable with an autonomous system deciding to cancel a lesson, rearrange a customer appointment or promise a delivery date without approval.
AI can analyse the workload.
The human should retain control of important commitments.
A Better Experiment: Give AI the Real Calendar
The obvious next stage would be to connect the planning system to the information that already exists.
Imagine AI being able, with appropriate permission, to examine:
the calendar;
incoming enquiries;
existing customer commitments;
project deadlines;
production jobs;
lesson schedules;
recurring administration;
task lists.
Then ask:
"Plan next week, but don't alter any appointments without asking me."
That is far more interesting than asking AI to produce a generic timetable.
It is beginning to behave like a virtual office manager.
A Possible AI-Generated Day
A realistic day might look more like this:
8.30–9.00 — Check urgent enquiries and day's commitments
9.00–10.30 — Concentrated video editing
10.30–10.45 — Buffer
10.45–11.45 — Film two short demonstrations while studio is configured
11.45–12.15 — Transfer footage and reset equipment
12.15–1.00 — Lunch
1.00–2.00 — Prepare afternoon lessons
2.00–2.45 — Administration and customer replies
2.45–3.15 — Buffer and tuition setup
3.15 onwards — Teaching schedule
After final lesson — Brief notes only; no major creative work
That looks less impressively packed than the earlier timetable.
And that is exactly why it might work.
The Objective Shouldn't Be 100% Utilisation
This may be the most important conclusion from the whole experiment.
If AI tries to maximise every available minute, it has probably misunderstood the task.
A business is not automatically more productive because every box in the diary contains something.
There needs to be capacity for:
thinking;
unexpected opportunities;
overruns;
customer enquiries;
equipment failures;
preparation;
rest;
simply doing something properly.
Perhaps the instruction to AI shouldn't be:
"Fit as much work as possible into my week."
Perhaps it should be:
"Create a week in which the important work gets completed reliably without making the timetable unrealistic."
Those are very different objectives.
AI as the Assistant, Not the Boss
I think this is where AI could become particularly valuable to a small business.
Not because it can somehow create more hours.
It cannot.
Instead, it can make the demands upon those hours more visible.
It can spot forgotten preparation.
It can question unrealistic assumptions.
It can group related jobs.
It can protect time for important work.
It can suggest priorities.
And when the inevitable disruption occurs, it can help rebuild the plan.
The final decision, however, remains human.
I know whether an extra half-hour with a student is worthwhile.
I know whether the weather makes sailing worth rearranging an afternoon for.
I know when a filming project needs another take rather than being declared "good enough".
And I know that sometimes the sensible decision is simply to stop.
That context matters.
So, Can AI Plan My Working Week?
Yes — but only if I tell it what a real working week actually looks like.
Simply feeding appointments into AI is unlikely to achieve much.
Give it preparation times, travel, priorities, deadlines, buffers, dependencies, preferred working patterns and realistic limits, however, and something much more useful begins to emerge.
The interesting future may not be an AI that runs my diary without me.
It may be an AI that looks at the diary and says:
"You have planned this as though nothing will go wrong."
And that might be exactly the warning a busy small-business owner needs.
A diary tells you when things happen. Perhaps the next generation of AI tools will help us decide when they should happen — and, just as importantly, when they shouldn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment