Multi-Sided Dice — Changing the Odds (Without Cheating)

If you’ve ever rolled a die and thought, “I need the universe to be slightly more on my side,” then congratulations — you’re already thinking like a game designer, a statistician, or a student five minutes before an exam.

Most people meet probability via the humble six-sided die (d6). Lovely. Familiar. Comforting. Like a mug of tea that can also disappoint you on a 1.

But the moment you introduce multi-sided dice — d4, d8, d10, d12, d20 (and their more exotic cousins) — you’re no longer just rolling… you’re tuning the odds.

Let’s have a rummage in the maths toolbox.

---

1) What changes when you change the number of sides?

A fair die with n sides gives a uniform distribution:

• Every number has probability 1/n

• The average (expected) roll is (n + 1) / 2

So:

• d6 average = (6+1)/2 = 3.5

• d20 average = (20+1)/2 = 10.5

That means swapping a d6 for a d20 doesn’t just “add variety” — it shifts the whole centre of gravity of outcomes.

Bigger die = bigger spread.
More dramatic highs… and more tragic lows (because maths enjoys balance).

---

2) “I need at least a 5” — how the odds change fast

Suppose your game / experiment / teacher says:

“Success if you roll 5 or more.”

Let’s compare:

• d6: outcomes 5–6 → 2/6 = 1/3 ≈ 33%

• d8: outcomes 5–8 → 4/8 = 1/2 = 50%

• d10: outcomes 5–10 → 6/10 = 60%

• d12: outcomes 5–12 → 8/12 = 66.7%

• d20: outcomes 5–20 → 16/20 = 80%

Same “target”, totally different reality.

So multi-sided dice let you keep the rules looking the same while changing how generous the universe is being behind the scenes. (This is also how some board games feel “kind” without admitting it.)

---

3) One big die vs lots of smaller dice (this is the really useful bit)

Here’s the twist: one die is uniform.
But adding dice changes the shape of the distribution.

Compare these:

• d12 → results 1–12, each equally likely (flat distribution)

• 2d6 → results 2–12, but not equally likely (peaked distribution)

With 2d6, totals in the middle happen far more often:

• 7 is common

• 2 and 12 are rare

So:

• If you want outcomes to cluster around “typical” values: use multiple dice

• If you want outcomes to feel swingy and unpredictable: use one bigger die

Game design translation:

• Multiple dice = consistent characters, predictable systems

• One big die = chaos goblin energy

---

4) “Make it exciting” vs “Make it fair”

People often say they want a game to be “fair”, but what they usually mean is:

• “I want to feel I had a chance”

• “I don’t want to fail five times in a row”

• “I want the results to match skill… most of the time”

Multi-sided dice give you dials to turn:

To reduce random drama:

• Use more dice (e.g., 3d6 instead of 1d20)

• Or narrow the range (d6 instead of d20)

To increase drama:

• Use a bigger single die (d20 gives epic swings)

• Add “critical” rules (e.g., max roll = bonus event)

---

5) A quick classroom / home experiment (no lab coat required)

Try this with students (or willing family members who haven’t realised what’s happening yet):

Task: Roll each option 50 times, record totals, and plot a simple bar chart.

• Option A: 1d12

• Option B: 2d6

Prediction:

• 1d12 will be flatter

• 2d6 will build a hill in the middle

Extension:
Turn it into GCSE/A-Level discussion:

• mean, median, mode

• range and spread

• why distributions matter (hello, real life)

If you want to go full “data-nerd”, stick it in a spreadsheet and let the bar chart do the storytelling.

---

6) Why this matters beyond board games

Multi-sided dice are really just simple models for random events:

• choosing random samples

• simulating “chance” in experiments

• designing scoring systems

• understanding risk and reliability

They’re also brilliant for explaining the difference between:

• uniform probability (one die)

• combined outcomes (multiple dice)

• and why “more rolls” doesn’t always mean “more randomness” — it can mean more predictability.

---

7) The takeaway (before the d4 destroys your bare foot)

Multi-sided dice don’t just change the numbers.

They change:

• how often you succeed

• how swingy outcomes feel

• whether results cluster or scatter

• and whether your game/lesson feels “fair”, “brutal”, or “suspiciously generous”

So next time you’re tempted to say, “It’s just a different die”…

No.
It’s a probability settings menu — in physical form.

And unlike most settings menus, this one can be launched across the room when someone rolls a 1.

Odd Time Signatures Aren’t Complicated… They’re Just 2s and 3s in a Trench Coat

Most music you hear is politely organised. It arrives on time, sits down neatly, and behaves itself in either 4/4 (“count to four, repeat until the biscuit tin is empty”) or 3/4 (the waltz: “one-two-three, look elegant, try not to fall over”).

But every so often, a piece of music turns up wearing a suspiciously large coat, sunglasses indoors, and a fake moustache… and you realise it’s not in 4/4 at all.

It’s in 5/4, 7/8, 11/8, or some other metre that makes your inner primary-school teacher reach for a whiteboard marker.

Here’s the secret: odd time signatures aren’t complicated — they’re just 2s and 3s in a trench coat.

---

Why use “strange” time signatures at all?

Because they do things that straight 4/4 simply can’t do as naturally.

1) They give you instant personality (and a built-in hook)

A groove in 4/4 can be brilliant… but it can also be dangerously familiar.
Odd metres create a distinctive “footprint” immediately.

• 5/4 often feels like a confident, slightly off-kilter stride.

• 7/8 can feel urgent and dancey, like it’s always leaning forward.

It’s the musical equivalent of someone walking into the room and you instantly thinking:
“Ah yes. They’re interesting. Possibly trouble. Definitely interesting.”

---

2) They match real speech and movement better than you’d expect

People do not speak in perfect blocks of four beats.

Try saying:

“Don’t forget the camera battery.”

That doesn’t naturally land in neat, symmetrical chunks. Odd metres let the stresses fall where they want instead of forcing them into a musical straightjacket.

This is why odd metres are brilliant for:

• lyrics that sound conversational

• rhythmic riffs that mimic real movement

• music that wants to feel human rather than looped

---

3) They create forward momentum without changing the tempo

In 4/4, the downbeat arrives like a reliable bus. In odd metres, it’s more like a bus that’s technically coming… but not exactly when you expect it.

That gentle uncertainty makes the music feel like it’s pulling you into the next bar.

Great for:

• film scoring

• suspense and build

• “something’s happening” YouTube underscoring

• energetic instrumentals without turning everything into a panic attack

---

4) They’re a brilliant contrast tool (without touching BPM)

You can keep the same tempo, same harmony, even the same instrumentation — and simply switch metre to change the whole vibe.

For example:

• Verse in 4/4 (comfortable)

• Pre-chorus in 7/8 (uh-oh, something’s shifting)

• Chorus back to 4/4 (big release)

It’s like walking slightly downhill for a while, then stepping onto a flat path again.
You didn’t notice the slope until it stopped.

---

5) They stop your music sounding like “another four-chord loop”

If you write regularly (or create lots of content), you start to recognise your own habits.

Odd metres are a friendly nudge that says:
“Try something new, Philip. Your chord loop is wearing the same jumper again.”

---

The simple way to understand odd metres

Most “weird” time signatures are just groups of 2 and 3.

Think accents, not maths.

• 5 = 2+3 or 3+2

• 7 = 2+2+3 or 3+2+2

• 11 = 3+3+3+2 (or any sensible combination that doesn’t injure the drummer)

Once you feel those groupings, the metre stops being mysterious and starts being… well… fun.

---

A few musical examples (so you can actually hear it)

You don’t have to be a theory wizard. Just listen for where the “long step” happens.

Example 1: 5/4 (grouped 3+2)

Count it like:
ONE-two-three ONE-two
Clap on the ONE each time.

A classic reference point: a certain famous jazzy 5/4 groove (you’ll know it when you hear it — it turns up in TV, films, and every drummer’s “look what I can do” moment).

Example 2: 7/8 (grouped 2+2+3)

Count:
ONE-two ONE-two ONE-two-three

This one is brilliant for energetic riffs. It feels like it’s always slightly ahead of you, in a very motivating way.

Example 3: Mixed metre (4/4 + 3/4)

This is the “phrase tidy-up” metre.
You’ve written something that naturally wants to end a beat early — so you let it. No padding. No filler. No musical small talk.

---

A practical tip for writers, musicians, and content creators

If odd time signatures feel intimidating, don’t “learn 11/8”.

Just learn:

• where the accents are

• and how to group 2s and 3s

That’s it.

Odd metres aren’t there to confuse the listener.
They’re there to make the music feel alive.

And if anyone asks why you used 7/8, you can say:
“It’s not weird. It’s just 2s and 3s in a trench coat.”
Then walk away before they ask you to clap it.

 DaVinci Resolve: Blink… and There’s Another Update!

It feels like every time I open DaVinci Resolve, there’s a new version waiting for me.

Not just a polite little bug fix.

A whole new feature set.

New AI tools.
New grading controls.
New editing workflows.
New audio tricks.

And I find myself thinking:

“I’ve only just mastered the last update!”

---

The Pace of Change is Relentless

In video production — whether for GCSE science lessons, sailing tutorials for pmrsailing.uk, or YouTube content — software evolves at a staggering pace.

What used to require:

• Separate compositing software

• Dedicated colour grading systems

• Specialist audio tools

Is now integrated into one platform.

That’s extraordinary.

But keeping up? That’s a job in itself.

---

The Hidden Cost: Learning Time

Every upgrade means:

• Watching tutorials

• Testing new features

• Rethinking workflow

• Adjusting keyboard shortcuts

• Updating old project templates

As someone running a multi-camera studio and producing regular educational content, that learning curve is real.

It’s tempting to ignore updates.

But…

---

The Benefits Are Huge

Each version usually brings:

• Smarter AI masking and tracking

• Faster rendering

• Better noise reduction

• Improved colour management

• More stable timelines

• Audio tools that rival dedicated DAWs

What once took hours now takes minutes.

That’s not incremental improvement — that’s transformative.

For educational video, that means:

• Cleaner diagrams

• Faster turnaround

• Better sound for online lessons

• More professional delivery

And that directly benefits students and viewers.

---

The Bigger Lesson

Technology is not slowing down.

If anything, AI tools inside editing software are accelerating the pace of change.

You either:

• Resist it and fall behind

• Or lean into it and grow

Yes, it’s hard work.

But the upside?
Creative freedom, efficiency, and results that were once only possible in major broadcast studios.

---

Final Thought

Keeping up with evolving technology is demanding — especially when you’re also teaching, filming, editing, sailing, and detailing the restoration of a B-Rater!

But standing still isn’t an option.

The tools are improving.
The possibilities are expanding.
And that’s exciting.

One Camera Only – A 360 Camera or a Smartphone?

 

One Camera Only – A 360 Camera or a Smartphone?

When you’re travelling light – whether that’s filming a science practical in the lab, capturing B-roll on the Thames, or documenting the restoration of a boat– sometimes you just want one camera in your pocket.

But which one?

A smartphone or a 360 camera?

---

📱 Smartphone

Why a Smartphone Makes Sense

Most of us already carry one. Modern phones shoot:

• 4K (often 60fps)

• Excellent HDR

• Strong stabilisation

• Surprisingly good audio (with external mic support)

For me, with science education videos, a smartphone on a tripod over a lab bench can produce excellent results, especially with good lighting. For quick GCSE or A-Level clips, it’s efficient and immediate.

Strengths

✔️ Simple workflow
✔️ Great for talking-head or structured shots
✔️ Easy editing on-device
✔️ Social media ready

Weaknesses

✖️ You must frame carefully
✖️ Miss the action outside your field of view
✖️ Limited creative reframing afterwards

If you don’t point it at the moment… you’ve missed it.

---

🔄 360 Camera

Now this is a different philosophy entirely.

A 360 camera records everything around it.

For sailing on the River Thames or on the coast or filming manoeuvres in a power boat, this is powerful. You don’t have to guess where the action will happen — you capture it all and decide later.

Strengths

✔️ Never miss the moment
✔️ Reframe in post-production
✔️ Incredible dynamic angles
✔️ Great for training and analysis

For example:

• Reviewing tacks and gybes from every angle

• Analysing crew movement

• Creating immersive YouTube or VR content

Weaknesses

✖️ Lower image quality per “normal” frame
✖️ More editing time
✖️ Can look gimmicky if overused

A 360 camera is not about point-and-shoot — it’s about capture now, decide later.

---

🎥 Which One Wins?

It depends on your purpose.

Choose a Smartphone If:

• You know exactly what you’re filming

• You want speed and simplicity

• You’re creating direct-to-camera teaching content

• You need reliable audio

Choose a 360 Camera If:

• You don’t know where the action will happen

• You’re moving (sailing, cycling, walking)

• You want flexibility in editing

• You enjoy creative reframing

---

🧠 A Deeper Question

This isn’t really about hardware.

It’s about control vs flexibility.

• Smartphone = intentional framing

• 360 camera = editorial freedom

Clouds in Infrared and Ultraviolet – Seeing the Sky Differently

The same cloud in UV and IR

Clouds in Infrared and Ultraviolet – Seeing the Sky Differently

When we look up at the sky, we think we’re seeing “everything”. But of course, we’re only seeing a tiny slice of the electromagnetic spectrum — visible light.

With the right filters and camera modifications, clouds become completely different subjects in infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) photography.

And if you enjoy science, sailing, or simply understanding the weather properly, this is fascinating territory.

---

☁️ Infrared (IR) – The Dramatic Sky

Infrared photography records light just beyond red, typically around 720nm and above.

What happens to clouds?

• Blue sky becomes very dark (because Rayleigh scattering is reduced in IR)

• White clouds become brilliant and luminous

• Water vapour absorbs differently

• High-altitude clouds stand out dramatically

The result?
A sky that looks almost stormy — even on a pleasant day.

For sailing photography (and yes, this matters when filming at Upper Thames SC), IR can:

• Enhance definition of cloud structures

• Reveal moisture differences

• Make otherwise flat skies look powerful

• Highlight developing cumulonimbus before the eye really notices contrast

It’s almost like turning up the drama slider on the atmosphere.

---

🌤️ Ultraviolet (UV) – The Scientific Sky

Ultraviolet photography is much harder.

Lenses, sensors and filters all behave differently in UV, and many modern lenses block UV entirely.

But when you capture it:

• Sky brightness changes significantly

• Haze becomes more apparent

• High-altitude scattering increases

• Thin cloud layers can show structure invisible in visible light

UV is particularly interesting for:

• Studying atmospheric clarity

• Examining pollution or aerosol effects

• Looking at subtle cloud layers

• Comparing scattering effects predicted by physics

If you teach GCSE or A-Level Physics, this is Rayleigh scattering in action — not just in a textbook, but in the sky above your head.

---

🌦 Why This Matters

For photographers:

• Creative impact

• Unique landscape results

• Weather storytelling

For sailors:

• Better awareness of cloud development

• Spotting high thin layers before wind shifts

For science students:

• Real-world electromagnetic spectrum applications

• Scattering theory made visible

• Atmosphere physics you can photograph

---

My Take

Having used multispectral cameras for science and sailing content, I’m always struck by how much information we ignore simply because our eyes can’t see it.

Clouds aren’t just white blobs.
They are complex optical phenomena interacting with wavelength, particle size, humidity, and solar angle.

And with IR or UV?
They tell a completely different story.

Crisp, Bright and Dry Days – Ideal for Drone Flying

 

Crisp, Bright and Dry Days – Ideal for Drone Flying

There’s something magical about a crisp, bright winter’s day in the UK.
The air feels cleaner. The sky seems bluer. The light has a clarity that photographers and videographers dream of.

For anyone flying a drone, these are the days you wait for.

---

❄️ Why Cold, Dry Air Makes a Difference

1. Better Visibility

Cold air tends to hold less moisture. Less moisture means less haze.
That means sharper horizons, better contrast, and richer colours straight out of the camera.

For landscape work — especially over water like the River Thames — clarity makes a huge difference.

2. Stunning Low-Angle Light

In winter, the sun stays low in the sky all day. That gives:

• Longer shadows

• Greater texture in fields and rooftops

• More dramatic side-lighting

• Beautiful golden tones even at midday

For storytelling footage, that texture adds depth and atmosphere without any special filters.

3. Dramatic Contrast

Bright sun + frosty ground = natural high contrast scenes.
Fields sparkle. Roofs glow. Trees stand out against blue skies.

It’s cinematography without the lighting crew.

---

🌬 The One Caveat: Wind

Crisp often means still — but not always.

High-pressure winter systems usually bring calm air, which is perfect for:

• Smooth tracking shots

• Stable hovering

• Clean reveal shots

• Slow, cinematic passes

But always check wind speed at height, not just at ground level.

---

🔋 What About Battery Performance?

Cold temperatures can reduce drone battery efficiency.

Practical tips:

• Keep batteries warm before flying (inside your coat pocket works well).

• Don’t launch immediately after taking batteries from a cold car boot.

• Expect slightly shorter flight times.

• Avoid draining batteries to very low percentages in cold weather.

If you’re filming regularly — perhaps building content for YouTube, LinkedIn or your sailing blog — planning shorter, focused flights can improve both safety and footage quality.

---

🌊 Perfect for River & Sailing Footage

For those of us filming on the Thames or around sailing clubs:

• Water reflections are clearer

• Mist patches can create cinematic atmosphere

• Frost outlines riverbanks beautifully

• Boats stand out sharply against darker winter water

If you're documenting winter sailing, restoration projects, or club life, these days give you footage that looks far more “produced” than it actually is.

---

🎥 Why These Days Are Content Gold

For anyone creating:

• Educational videos

• Sailing content

• Environmental blogs

• Property or architecture footage

• Promotional clips

Crisp days mean:

✔ Less colour correction in post
✔ Sharper imagery
✔ Natural drama
✔ Professional-looking results

All without upgrading your camera.

---

Final Thought

The best gear isn’t always a new camera.
Sometimes it’s simply stepping outside on the right day.

When the sky is deep blue, the air is sharp, and the wind is gentle — that’s your cue.

Charge the batteries.
Check the airspace.
And go flying.

 Do I Really Need a New Camera?

It’s the question that quietly creeps up on every photographer and videographer:

Is it time to upgrade… or am I just being tempted by shiny new kit?

In our studio we’re already using solid gear — cameras like the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and even older bodies such as the Canon EOS 7D. Both still produce excellent images in the right hands.

And yet… cinema cameras like the Canon EOS C70 sit there whispering:

“Better dynamic range… built-in ND filters… superior codecs…”

So — do we really need a new camera?

---

1️⃣ The Honest Question: What’s Not Working?

Before spending thousands, ask:

• Are clients complaining about image quality?

• Is autofocus genuinely holding you back?

• Are low-light results unusable?

• Is workflow inefficient because of codec limitations?

• Are you losing work because competitors offer something you can’t?

If the answer is “no” to most of those, then the issue probably isn’t the camera.

For example, many DSLR bodies still deliver:

• 4K video

• Excellent colour science

• Interchangeable lenses

• Reliable performance

For YouTube science demonstrations, sailing footage on the Thames, and even online tuition content, lighting and audio usually matter more than the latest sensor.

---

2️⃣ Where New Cameras Do Make a Difference

There are real reasons to upgrade:

✅ Built-in ND filters

Massive time-saver for outdoor filming (especially sailing).

✅ Better dynamic range

Helps when filming bright skies and darker faces simultaneously.

✅ Improved autofocus

For single-operator shoots, this can genuinely change efficiency.

✅ Professional codecs

If you colour grade heavily in DaVinci Resolve, better codecs give more flexibility.

If your work has shifted toward more commercial video production, a cinema body may be justified.

---

3️⃣ The Trap: Spec Sheet Envy

Camera companies are brilliant at marketing.

But:

• Viewers rarely know what camera you used.

• Students watching an A-Level chemistry video care about clarity — not bit depth.

• A sailing audience prefers a stable shot and good storytelling.

A well-lit scene shot on a five-year-old camera will look better than a poorly lit scene shot on the newest release.

---

4️⃣ Upgrade the Bottleneck, Not the Badge

Instead of a new body, ask:

• Do you need better lenses?

• Better lighting?

• Better microphones?

• A more efficient editing workflow?

• A second camera for multi-angle shooting?

Often the biggest improvements come from:

• Lighting control

• Sound quality

• Camera positioning

• Storytelling skill

---

5️⃣ A Simple Upgrade Rule

Only upgrade when:

The camera is limiting your creativity or income — not your curiosity.

If your current system:

• Produces clean 4K

• Handles colour reliably

• Matches your lens investment

… then it may still be perfectly fit for purpose.

---

🎬 Final Thought

Sometimes the best upgrade isn’t a new camera.

It’s:

• Better composition

• Better editing

• Better storytelling

• Better teaching

Technology moves fast.

But skill ages very well.

When You Really Need to Pack Light – What Camera Gear Do You Take?

 

When You Really Need to Pack Light – What Camera Gear Do You Take?

There are days when you can roll out the full kit: multiple bodies, heavy lenses, tripods, lighting, audio recorders…

And then there are days when you can’t.

Sailing on the Thames. Hiking. Travelling hand luggage only. Filming at an event where you must move quickly. Or simply when your back says, “Enough.”

So what do you take — and what do you leave behind?

---

1️⃣ The Ultra-Light Option – Smartphone

Weight: Almost nothing
Flexibility: Very high
Control: Limited (but improving)

Modern smartphones shoot 4K, stabilise beautifully, and edit on the device itself.

Perfect for:

• Quick social posts

• Behind-the-scenes clips

• Spontaneous sailing footage

• Fast turnarounds

But…

• Limited dynamic range compared to larger sensors

• Audio still needs help (add a tiny lav mic)

• Fixed lens limits creativity

For pmrsailing-style daily updates? A phone can be absolutely enough.

---

2️⃣ The Compact Hybrid – Mirrorless Body + 1 Lens

A camera such as the Canon EOS R5 C (or similar hybrid body) paired with a single versatile lens — for example a 24–105mm.

Why one lens?
Because changing lenses:

• Slows you down

• Introduces dust

• Makes you carry more

With one good zoom you can:

• Shoot wide establishing shots

• Capture portraits

• Film mid-range action

Add:

• 1 spare battery

• Small on-camera mic

• Lightweight travel tripod or monopod

That’s it.

This is often the sweet spot between quality and portability.

---

3️⃣ The “Serious but Sensible” Video Setup

If you’re filming something more structured — perhaps science demonstrations in your lab or a planned sailing shoot — you might bring a compact cinema body such as the Canon EOS C70.

But keep it disciplined:

• Camera body

• One zoom lens

• Shotgun mic

• 2 batteries

• No extras

No sliders.
No second camera.
No five-lens collection.

The rule becomes:

If it doesn’t earn its place in the bag, it stays at home.

---

🎯 My Personal Packing Rule

For River Thames sailing days or family filming:

• One main camera

• One lens

• One microphone

• One support (mini tripod or monopod)

And that’s all.

The electric Whaly is already carrying safety kit, lines, batteries and camera mounts — so weight matters. The lighter the kit, the more likely it gets used.

And unused kit produces exactly zero content.

---

💡 A Helpful Mindset Shift

The question isn’t:

“What might I possibly need?”

It’s:

“What will I realistically use?”

The lighter the setup:

• The faster you react

• The less tired you become

• The more natural your footage feels

Sometimes constraints improve creativity.

Filming and Editing Just With a Phone Most people do it… but is it really the best choice?

 

Filming and Editing Just With a Phone

Most people do it… but is it really the best choice?

In 2026, almost everyone has a 4K video camera in their pocket. Whether you're filming a GCSE physics explanation, a sailing manoeuvre on the Thames, or a quick sustainability tip for social media, the phone is often the first tool we reach for.

But here’s the honest question:

Just because we can film and edit entirely on a phone… does that mean we should?

---

Why Phones Are So Popular

1️⃣ Convenience

The best camera is the one you have with you. Phones win every time here.
Spotted a perfect sailing moment? Quick experiment in the lab? Family reaction shot?
You’re already ready.

2️⃣ Integrated Workflow

Shoot → edit → upload → post
All on one device. No cables. No memory cards. No file transfers.

Apps like CapCut, Adobe Premiere Rush and LumaFusion make surprisingly polished edits possible.

3️⃣ Social Media Optimisation

Phones are designed for vertical video.
Platforms like TikTok, Instagram and YouTube (Shorts) reward speed and frequency over cinematic perfection.

If you're producing daily content — like many creators — speed matters.

---

But Here’s the Catch…

🎤 Audio Is Everything

Phone microphones are decent… but not professional.
In education especially (GCSE & A-Level), clarity matters more than resolution.

A £30 external mic can transform results — but now we’re no longer “just using a phone,” are we?

---

🎥 Control and Depth

Phones rely heavily on computational photography. That’s brilliant — until you need:

• Manual exposure control

• Reliable depth of field

• Clean low-light performance

• Interchangeable lenses

When filming science practicals, sailing footage on reflective water, or studio lessons, control matters.

That’s where hybrid cameras and cinema cameras (like the Canon EOS R5 C or Canon EOS C70) begin to justify themselves.

---

🧠 Editing Limits

Editing on a phone works — until projects become:

• Multi-camera

• Long-form (20+ minutes)

• Graphics-heavy

• Colour-grade dependent

Software like DaVinci Resolve simply offers more precision for serious production.

For quick reels? Phone is fine.
For structured educational content? Desktop still wins.

---

So… Is It the Best Choice?

It depends entirely on your goal:

Goal	Phone Only?
Quick daily social posts	✅ Absolutely
Behind-the-scenes clips	✅ Yes
YouTube educational lessons	⚠️ Maybe
Commercial-quality production	❌ Probably not
Long-term brand building	⚠️ Hybrid approach best

---

The Real Question

Is your aim:

• To capture the moment?

• Or to build something that lasts?

There’s no shame in using a phone. In fact, it’s brilliant technology.

But when quality becomes part of your brand — especially in education, sailing instruction, or professional media — your tools begin to matter.

---

My View

For spontaneous filming (like catching a perfect gust during a gybe on the Thames) — phones are unbeatable.

For structured lessons, controlled lighting, multi-camera studio work — dedicated kit still leads.

The smartest approach?
Use the phone when speed matters.
Use the camera when quality matters.

Not either/or — but strategic choice.